And we are still well ...
link here .
Tuesday, April 22, 2008
Thursday, April 17, 2008
Laptop To Eyeclops Projector
Sponsor a postdoc Charles Darwin on-line travel
The complete works of Charles Darwin with much related material is already accessible on-line in http://www.darwin-online.org.uk/
Laptop To Eyeclops Projector
Sponsor a postdoc Charles Darwin on-line travel
The complete works of Charles Darwin with much related material is already accessible on-line in http://www.darwin-online.org.uk/
Wednesday, April 16, 2008
Ice Fishing Fish Finder Sale
dies Edward Lorenz, father of chaos theory, at age 90
WASHINGTON (Reuters) - Edward Lorenz, father of chaos theory and who showed how small actions can cause large changes in what could be known as the "butterfly effect," died Wednesday at age 90 from cancer, said Massachusetts Institute of Technology.
Lorenz, a meteorologist, discovered in the 1960s that small differences in a dynamic system like the atmosphere could set off enormous changes. In 1972 he presented a study entitled "Predictibidad: The Beat of a butterfly's wings in Brazil causes a Tornado in Texas?."
born in 1917 in West Hartford, Connecticut, Lorenz earned degrees in mathematics from Dartmouth College in 1938, from Harvard University in 1940, and degrees in meteorology from the Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT, for its acronym in English) 1943 and 1948.
While working as a weather forecaster for the Army Air Corps United States in World War II, decided to study meteorology.
"As a child I was always interested in doing things with numbers and was also fascinated by changes in weather, "Lorenz wrote in an autobiography.
" By showing that certain deterministic systems have formal predictability limits, Lorenz put the last nail in the coffin of the Cartesian universe and fomented what some have called the third scientific revolution of the 20th century, on the heels of relativity and quantum physics, "said Kerry Emanuel, professor of atmospheric science at MIT.
" was also a perfect gentleman, and through his intelligence, integrity and humility set a very high standard for future generations, "Emanuel said in a statement.
In 1991, Lorenz won the Kyoto Prize for basic sciences in the field of earth and planetary sciences.
The prize committee said Lorenz "made his boldest scientific achievement in discovering the 'deterministic chaos', a principle which has profoundly influenced a wide range of basic sciences and brought about one of the most dramatic changes in vision that mankind had of nature since Sir Isaac Newton. "
Lorenz, who enjoyed hiking and skiing, stayed active until two weeks before his death at his home in Cambridge, Massachusetts, his family said. He left three sons and four grandchildren. (Reporting by Maggie Fox, editing by Alan Elsner English)
© Reuters 2008 All rights reserved.
WASHINGTON (Reuters) - Edward Lorenz, father of chaos theory and who showed how small actions can cause large changes in what could be known as the "butterfly effect," died Wednesday at age 90 from cancer, said Massachusetts Institute of Technology.
Lorenz, a meteorologist, discovered in the 1960s that small differences in a dynamic system like the atmosphere could set off enormous changes. In 1972 he presented a study entitled "Predictibidad: The Beat of a butterfly's wings in Brazil causes a Tornado in Texas?."
born in 1917 in West Hartford, Connecticut, Lorenz earned degrees in mathematics from Dartmouth College in 1938, from Harvard University in 1940, and degrees in meteorology from the Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT, for its acronym in English) 1943 and 1948.
While working as a weather forecaster for the Army Air Corps United States in World War II, decided to study meteorology.
"As a child I was always interested in doing things with numbers and was also fascinated by changes in weather, "Lorenz wrote in an autobiography.
" By showing that certain deterministic systems have formal predictability limits, Lorenz put the last nail in the coffin of the Cartesian universe and fomented what some have called the third scientific revolution of the 20th century, on the heels of relativity and quantum physics, "said Kerry Emanuel, professor of atmospheric science at MIT.
" was also a perfect gentleman, and through his intelligence, integrity and humility set a very high standard for future generations, "Emanuel said in a statement.
In 1991, Lorenz won the Kyoto Prize for basic sciences in the field of earth and planetary sciences.
The prize committee said Lorenz "made his boldest scientific achievement in discovering the 'deterministic chaos', a principle which has profoundly influenced a wide range of basic sciences and brought about one of the most dramatic changes in vision that mankind had of nature since Sir Isaac Newton. "
Lorenz, who enjoyed hiking and skiing, stayed active until two weeks before his death at his home in Cambridge, Massachusetts, his family said. He left three sons and four grandchildren. (Reporting by Maggie Fox, editing by Alan Elsner English)
© Reuters 2008 All rights reserved.
Ice Fishing Fish Finder Sale
dies Edward Lorenz, father of chaos theory, at age 90
WASHINGTON (Reuters) - Edward Lorenz, father of chaos theory and who showed how small actions can cause large changes in what could be known as the "butterfly effect," died Wednesday at age 90 from cancer, said Massachusetts Institute of Technology.
Lorenz, a meteorologist, discovered in the 1960s that small differences in a dynamic system like the atmosphere could set off enormous changes. In 1972 he presented a study entitled "Predictibidad: The Beat of a butterfly's wings in Brazil causes a Tornado in Texas?."
born in 1917 in West Hartford, Connecticut, Lorenz earned degrees in mathematics from Dartmouth College in 1938, from Harvard University in 1940, and degrees in meteorology from the Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT, for its acronym in English) 1943 and 1948.
While working as a weather forecaster for the Army Air Corps United States in World War II, decided to study meteorology.
"As a child I was always interested in doing things with numbers and was also fascinated by changes in weather, "Lorenz wrote in an autobiography.
" By showing that certain deterministic systems have formal predictability limits, Lorenz put the last nail in the coffin of the Cartesian universe and fomented what some have called the third scientific revolution of the 20th century, on the heels of relativity and quantum physics, "said Kerry Emanuel, professor of atmospheric science at MIT.
" was also a perfect gentleman, and through his intelligence, integrity and humility set a very high standard for future generations, "Emanuel said in a statement.
In 1991, Lorenz won the Kyoto Prize for basic sciences in the field of earth and planetary sciences.
The prize committee said Lorenz "made his boldest scientific achievement in discovering the 'deterministic chaos', a principle which has profoundly influenced a wide range of basic sciences and brought about one of the most dramatic changes in vision that mankind had of nature since Sir Isaac Newton. "
Lorenz, who enjoyed hiking and skiing, stayed active until two weeks before his death at his home in Cambridge, Massachusetts, his family said. He left three sons and four grandchildren. (Reporting by Maggie Fox, editing by Alan Elsner English)
© Reuters 2008 All rights reserved.
WASHINGTON (Reuters) - Edward Lorenz, father of chaos theory and who showed how small actions can cause large changes in what could be known as the "butterfly effect," died Wednesday at age 90 from cancer, said Massachusetts Institute of Technology.
Lorenz, a meteorologist, discovered in the 1960s that small differences in a dynamic system like the atmosphere could set off enormous changes. In 1972 he presented a study entitled "Predictibidad: The Beat of a butterfly's wings in Brazil causes a Tornado in Texas?."
born in 1917 in West Hartford, Connecticut, Lorenz earned degrees in mathematics from Dartmouth College in 1938, from Harvard University in 1940, and degrees in meteorology from the Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT, for its acronym in English) 1943 and 1948.
While working as a weather forecaster for the Army Air Corps United States in World War II, decided to study meteorology.
"As a child I was always interested in doing things with numbers and was also fascinated by changes in weather, "Lorenz wrote in an autobiography.
" By showing that certain deterministic systems have formal predictability limits, Lorenz put the last nail in the coffin of the Cartesian universe and fomented what some have called the third scientific revolution of the 20th century, on the heels of relativity and quantum physics, "said Kerry Emanuel, professor of atmospheric science at MIT.
" was also a perfect gentleman, and through his intelligence, integrity and humility set a very high standard for future generations, "Emanuel said in a statement.
In 1991, Lorenz won the Kyoto Prize for basic sciences in the field of earth and planetary sciences.
The prize committee said Lorenz "made his boldest scientific achievement in discovering the 'deterministic chaos', a principle which has profoundly influenced a wide range of basic sciences and brought about one of the most dramatic changes in vision that mankind had of nature since Sir Isaac Newton. "
Lorenz, who enjoyed hiking and skiing, stayed active until two weeks before his death at his home in Cambridge, Massachusetts, his family said. He left three sons and four grandchildren. (Reporting by Maggie Fox, editing by Alan Elsner English)
© Reuters 2008 All rights reserved.
Monday, April 14, 2008
How Often Do Nhl Players Get New Pads?
Edward Lorenz, change
time ago I want to write on this subject but take a few minutes of quiet to think about how this has become a mission impossible. However, certain events that have happened around me lately have allowed me to find the perfect approach. We always think about religion in scientific terms, but what is a religious science?
As belief in something, in the scientific world many people are deeply religious, but many more superstitious. Scientists Are we superstitious? The answer, resounding, YES. The difference between religion and superstition is large, we must be aware of this. But they are related.
is normal as a result of our work, we need to have everything under control, since the study subjects to the conditions in which the study is done. However, many times we so freely to the real need that ends up as something magical, as well as slavery. We all have bad run of results and, when at the end of the tunnel we found the solution, how we come to it becomes the truth. How right? Obviously NO.
all have our particular superstition and why it is so important to change, to go. You realize that not only is your how it works, that of others too. In the end, travel, change, is a cure for many diseases. And in this business much more. When research is appealing to the need to change laboratory, to prevent people make their entire research career in the same place, not just to avoid inbreeding, also. Superstition is avoided, which is even worse.
PS today El Pais. 
time ago I want to write on this subject but take a few minutes of quiet to think about how this has become a mission impossible. However, certain events that have happened around me lately have allowed me to find the perfect approach. We always think about religion in scientific terms, but what is a religious science?
As belief in something, in the scientific world many people are deeply religious, but many more superstitious. Scientists Are we superstitious? The answer, resounding, YES. The difference between religion and superstition is large, we must be aware of this. But they are related.
is normal as a result of our work, we need to have everything under control, since the study subjects to the conditions in which the study is done. However, many times we so freely to the real need that ends up as something magical, as well as slavery. We all have bad run of results and, when at the end of the tunnel we found the solution, how we come to it becomes the truth. How right? Obviously NO.
all have our particular superstition and why it is so important to change, to go. You realize that not only is your how it works, that of others too. In the end, travel, change, is a cure for many diseases. And in this business much more. When research is appealing to the need to change laboratory, to prevent people make their entire research career in the same place, not just to avoid inbreeding, also. Superstition is avoided, which is even worse.
PS today El Pais.
How Often Do Nhl Players Get New Pads?
Edward Lorenz, change
time ago I want to write on this subject but take a few minutes of quiet to think about how this has become a mission impossible. However, certain events that have happened around me lately have allowed me to find the perfect approach. We always think about religion in scientific terms, but what is a religious science?
As belief in something, in the scientific world many people are deeply religious, but many more superstitious. Scientists Are we superstitious? The answer, resounding, YES. The difference between religion and superstition is large, we must be aware of this. But they are related.
is normal as a result of our work, we need to have everything under control, since the study subjects to the conditions in which the study is done. However, many times we so freely to the real need that ends up as something magical, as well as slavery. We all have bad run of results and, when at the end of the tunnel we found the solution, how we come to it becomes the truth. How right? Obviously NO.
all have our particular superstition and why it is so important to change, to go. You realize that not only is your how it works, that of others too. In the end, travel, change, is a cure for many diseases. And in this business much more. When research is appealing to the need to change laboratory, to prevent people make their entire research career in the same place, not just to avoid inbreeding, also. Superstition is avoided, which is even worse.
PS today El Pais.
time ago I want to write on this subject but take a few minutes of quiet to think about how this has become a mission impossible. However, certain events that have happened around me lately have allowed me to find the perfect approach. We always think about religion in scientific terms, but what is a religious science?
As belief in something, in the scientific world many people are deeply religious, but many more superstitious. Scientists Are we superstitious? The answer, resounding, YES. The difference between religion and superstition is large, we must be aware of this. But they are related.
is normal as a result of our work, we need to have everything under control, since the study subjects to the conditions in which the study is done. However, many times we so freely to the real need that ends up as something magical, as well as slavery. We all have bad run of results and, when at the end of the tunnel we found the solution, how we come to it becomes the truth. How right? Obviously NO.
all have our particular superstition and why it is so important to change, to go. You realize that not only is your how it works, that of others too. In the end, travel, change, is a cure for many diseases. And in this business much more. When research is appealing to the need to change laboratory, to prevent people make their entire research career in the same place, not just to avoid inbreeding, also. Superstition is avoided, which is even worse.
PS today El Pais.
Friday, April 11, 2008
I.d. Bare Minerals Vs European
Article on Campus (El Mundo)
http://www.elmundo.es/suplementos/campus/2008/514/1207692006.html
RESEARCH
The 'Ramón y Cajal' does not prevent the brain drain Despite the state's economic effort in this program, many scientists are reluctant to join research centers in Spain. The lack of transparency in the race and the absence of wage incentives seem to be some of the pitfalls
E.
LANDALUCE
During discussions between José Luis Rodríguez Zapatero and Mariano Rajoy, the increased investment in R + D + i for the executive during the last term was introduced by the winner of elections as the best remedy to cure the ailing economy English. Not without reason. But many scientists believe that the commitment to science in Spain sins still a lack of ambition and is very attractive to English brains that are currently working centers abroad.
is the case of Michael House, Molecular Microbiology specialist who is currently researching for the University of Nottingham. In 2001 he was awarded one of the assignments of Ramón y Cajal program to establish a English university in its own area of \u200b\u200bresearch in intercellular communication in bacteria. After years in the bleak British weather, the return was a very attractive option.
Why not accept it? "Then I was offered no guarantee of a place at the end of my contract. In addition, the university where I work now provides other unthinkable things in institutions and English, as possibilities promotion and leading research infrastructure. I have my achievements properly paid extra salary increases ...". It also states that many prefer to English scientists abroad "because they recognize his merits more investigation and were accepted by them and not their contacts" . Laura Morales, a researcher at the University of Manchester, was also selected by the program Ramón y Cajal in the July 2007.
However I still do not know whether to accept the offer of a research center. "Return to your country always an incentive. But it would mean losing a third of my salary, and the freedom and autonomy of that joy in Manchester, where I have my own research team. Would become dependent on a professor or a department head at times even have a curriculum less than mine. "
" I am also concerned that no clear rules on how to climb the ladder, nor economic incentives. One example is that we have no right to wage supplements that can have an assistant doctor. And we do not promote no later than five years because they lose the financial assistance that involves the program. "Chamber match in this analysis:" If a scientist has a brilliant curriculum abroad and to convince him to return Spain is due to an attractive and reasonable. The minimum is-apart from a fixed square-decent infrastructure. No one with an established career would be willing to accept these conditions. For my part, I maintain that Spain is a far cry from United Kingdom ".
On the other hand, strict limits bureaucratic desire to improve scientists, as a complaint Naomi Cabrera, secretary general of the National Association of Ramón y Cajal Researchers ( Anirc): "In the CSIC is a researcher who has one year left of contract and has received enough money from Europe for a project that just presented. But the CSIC has rejected the inquiry because he only is a contract year. "He also defended from Anirc that" the funding of universities should be linked to research objectives, not just alumni. This will achieve a greater commitment from the institutions. "" It's a shame to see that you are training very good people in our country and then other countries take advantage of their brains. English as he loves his people and their culture, it really hurts, "concludes House.
stability guaranteed by the ministry
The stability of the square in the center that they claimed was a concern of scientists returning to the Program Ramón y Cajal. After the first five years that lasted the aid, the contract was expiring. However, since 2007 the contracts for work and service that until now could offer researchers go on to have an indefinite and requires the contracting centers to ensure the square to the researchers. Naomi Cabrera says "it is true that since the Government is doing everything possible to stabilize the workforce to researchers. However, there are still many of the first calls that they are about to terminate contracts without being offered any solution. However, Cabrera acknowledges the support of Ministry of Education to these
researchers: "Apart from initiatives such as I3, a program that encourages stable contracts researchers paying the first three years of salary, is considering working with one of the Cajal through separate lines of funding. " 
http://www.elmundo.es/suplementos/campus/2008/514/1207692006.html
RESEARCH
The 'Ramón y Cajal' does not prevent the brain drain Despite the state's economic effort in this program, many scientists are reluctant to join research centers in Spain. The lack of transparency in the race and the absence of wage incentives seem to be some of the pitfalls
E.
LANDALUCE
During discussions between José Luis Rodríguez Zapatero and Mariano Rajoy, the increased investment in R + D + i for the executive during the last term was introduced by the winner of elections as the best remedy to cure the ailing economy English. Not without reason. But many scientists believe that the commitment to science in Spain sins still a lack of ambition and is very attractive to English brains that are currently working centers abroad.
is the case of Michael House, Molecular Microbiology specialist who is currently researching for the University of Nottingham. In 2001 he was awarded one of the assignments of Ramón y Cajal program to establish a English university in its own area of \u200b\u200bresearch in intercellular communication in bacteria. After years in the bleak British weather, the return was a very attractive option.
Why not accept it? "Then I was offered no guarantee of a place at the end of my contract. In addition, the university where I work now provides other unthinkable things in institutions and English, as possibilities promotion and leading research infrastructure. I have my achievements properly paid extra salary increases ...". It also states that many prefer to English scientists abroad "because they recognize his merits more investigation and were accepted by them and not their contacts" . Laura Morales, a researcher at the University of Manchester, was also selected by the program Ramón y Cajal in the July 2007.
However I still do not know whether to accept the offer of a research center. "Return to your country always an incentive. But it would mean losing a third of my salary, and the freedom and autonomy of that joy in Manchester, where I have my own research team. Would become dependent on a professor or a department head at times even have a curriculum less than mine. "
" I am also concerned that no clear rules on how to climb the ladder, nor economic incentives. One example is that we have no right to wage supplements that can have an assistant doctor. And we do not promote no later than five years because they lose the financial assistance that involves the program. "Chamber match in this analysis:" If a scientist has a brilliant curriculum abroad and to convince him to return Spain is due to an attractive and reasonable. The minimum is-apart from a fixed square-decent infrastructure. No one with an established career would be willing to accept these conditions. For my part, I maintain that Spain is a far cry from United Kingdom ".
On the other hand, strict limits bureaucratic desire to improve scientists, as a complaint Naomi Cabrera, secretary general of the National Association of Ramón y Cajal Researchers ( Anirc): "In the CSIC is a researcher who has one year left of contract and has received enough money from Europe for a project that just presented. But the CSIC has rejected the inquiry because he only is a contract year. "He also defended from Anirc that" the funding of universities should be linked to research objectives, not just alumni. This will achieve a greater commitment from the institutions. "" It's a shame to see that you are training very good people in our country and then other countries take advantage of their brains. English as he loves his people and their culture, it really hurts, "concludes House.
stability guaranteed by the ministry
The stability of the square in the center that they claimed was a concern of scientists returning to the Program Ramón y Cajal. After the first five years that lasted the aid, the contract was expiring. However, since 2007 the contracts for work and service that until now could offer researchers go on to have an indefinite and requires the contracting centers to ensure the square to the researchers. Naomi Cabrera says "it is true that since the Government is doing everything possible to stabilize the workforce to researchers. However, there are still many of the first calls that they are about to terminate contracts without being offered any solution. However, Cabrera acknowledges the support of Ministry of Education to these
researchers: "Apart from initiatives such as I3, a program that encourages stable contracts researchers paying the first three years of salary, is considering working with one of the Cajal through separate lines of funding. "
I.d. Bare Minerals Vs European
Article on Campus (El Mundo)
http://www.elmundo.es/suplementos/campus/2008/514/1207692006.html
RESEARCH
The 'Ramón y Cajal' does not prevent the brain drain Despite the state's economic effort in this program, many scientists are reluctant to join research centers in Spain. The lack of transparency in the race and the absence of wage incentives seem to be some of the pitfalls
E.
LANDALUCE
During discussions between José Luis Rodríguez Zapatero and Mariano Rajoy, the increased investment in R + D + i for the executive during the last term was introduced by the winner of elections as the best remedy to cure the ailing economy English. Not without reason. But many scientists believe that the commitment to science in Spain sins still a lack of ambition and is very attractive to English brains that are currently working centers abroad.
is the case of Michael House, Molecular Microbiology specialist who is currently researching for the University of Nottingham. In 2001 he was awarded one of the assignments of Ramón y Cajal program to establish a English university in its own area of \u200b\u200bresearch in intercellular communication in bacteria. After years in the bleak British weather, the return was a very attractive option.
Why not accept it? "Then I was offered no guarantee of a place at the end of my contract. In addition, the university where I work now provides other unthinkable things in institutions and English, as possibilities promotion and leading research infrastructure. I have my achievements properly paid extra salary increases ...". It also states that many prefer to English scientists abroad "because they recognize his merits more investigation and were accepted by them and not their contacts" . Laura Morales, a researcher at the University of Manchester, was also selected by the program Ramón y Cajal in the July 2007.
However I still do not know whether to accept the offer of a research center. "Return to your country always an incentive. But it would mean losing a third of my salary, and the freedom and autonomy of that joy in Manchester, where I have my own research team. Would become dependent on a professor or a department head at times even have a curriculum less than mine. "
" I am also concerned that no clear rules on how to climb the ladder, nor economic incentives. One example is that we have no right to wage supplements that can have an assistant doctor. And we do not promote no later than five years because they lose the financial assistance that involves the program. "Chamber match in this analysis:" If a scientist has a brilliant curriculum abroad and to convince him to return Spain is due to an attractive and reasonable. The minimum is-apart from a fixed square-decent infrastructure. No one with an established career would be willing to accept these conditions. For my part, I maintain that Spain is a far cry from United Kingdom ".
On the other hand, strict limits bureaucratic desire to improve scientists, as a complaint Naomi Cabrera, secretary general of the National Association of Ramón y Cajal Researchers ( Anirc): "In the CSIC is a researcher who has one year left of contract and has received enough money from Europe for a project that just presented. But the CSIC has rejected the inquiry because he only is a contract year. "He also defended from Anirc that" the funding of universities should be linked to research objectives, not just alumni. This will achieve a greater commitment from the institutions. "" It's a shame to see that you are training very good people in our country and then other countries take advantage of their brains. English as he loves his people and their culture, it really hurts, "concludes House.
stability guaranteed by the ministry
The stability of the square in the center that they claimed was a concern of scientists returning to the Program Ramón y Cajal. After the first five years that lasted the aid, the contract was expiring. However, since 2007 the contracts for work and service that until now could offer researchers go on to have an indefinite and requires the contracting centers to ensure the square to the researchers. Naomi Cabrera says "it is true that since the Government is doing everything possible to stabilize the workforce to researchers. However, there are still many of the first calls that they are about to terminate contracts without being offered any solution. However, Cabrera acknowledges the support of Ministry of Education to these
researchers: "Apart from initiatives such as I3, a program that encourages stable contracts researchers paying the first three years of salary, is considering working with one of the Cajal through separate lines of funding. "
http://www.elmundo.es/suplementos/campus/2008/514/1207692006.html
RESEARCH
The 'Ramón y Cajal' does not prevent the brain drain Despite the state's economic effort in this program, many scientists are reluctant to join research centers in Spain. The lack of transparency in the race and the absence of wage incentives seem to be some of the pitfalls
E.
LANDALUCE
During discussions between José Luis Rodríguez Zapatero and Mariano Rajoy, the increased investment in R + D + i for the executive during the last term was introduced by the winner of elections as the best remedy to cure the ailing economy English. Not without reason. But many scientists believe that the commitment to science in Spain sins still a lack of ambition and is very attractive to English brains that are currently working centers abroad.
is the case of Michael House, Molecular Microbiology specialist who is currently researching for the University of Nottingham. In 2001 he was awarded one of the assignments of Ramón y Cajal program to establish a English university in its own area of \u200b\u200bresearch in intercellular communication in bacteria. After years in the bleak British weather, the return was a very attractive option.
Why not accept it? "Then I was offered no guarantee of a place at the end of my contract. In addition, the university where I work now provides other unthinkable things in institutions and English, as possibilities promotion and leading research infrastructure. I have my achievements properly paid extra salary increases ...". It also states that many prefer to English scientists abroad "because they recognize his merits more investigation and were accepted by them and not their contacts" . Laura Morales, a researcher at the University of Manchester, was also selected by the program Ramón y Cajal in the July 2007.
However I still do not know whether to accept the offer of a research center. "Return to your country always an incentive. But it would mean losing a third of my salary, and the freedom and autonomy of that joy in Manchester, where I have my own research team. Would become dependent on a professor or a department head at times even have a curriculum less than mine. "
" I am also concerned that no clear rules on how to climb the ladder, nor economic incentives. One example is that we have no right to wage supplements that can have an assistant doctor. And we do not promote no later than five years because they lose the financial assistance that involves the program. "Chamber match in this analysis:" If a scientist has a brilliant curriculum abroad and to convince him to return Spain is due to an attractive and reasonable. The minimum is-apart from a fixed square-decent infrastructure. No one with an established career would be willing to accept these conditions. For my part, I maintain that Spain is a far cry from United Kingdom ".
On the other hand, strict limits bureaucratic desire to improve scientists, as a complaint Naomi Cabrera, secretary general of the National Association of Ramón y Cajal Researchers ( Anirc): "In the CSIC is a researcher who has one year left of contract and has received enough money from Europe for a project that just presented. But the CSIC has rejected the inquiry because he only is a contract year. "He also defended from Anirc that" the funding of universities should be linked to research objectives, not just alumni. This will achieve a greater commitment from the institutions. "" It's a shame to see that you are training very good people in our country and then other countries take advantage of their brains. English as he loves his people and their culture, it really hurts, "concludes House.
stability guaranteed by the ministry
The stability of the square in the center that they claimed was a concern of scientists returning to the Program Ramón y Cajal. After the first five years that lasted the aid, the contract was expiring. However, since 2007 the contracts for work and service that until now could offer researchers go on to have an indefinite and requires the contracting centers to ensure the square to the researchers. Naomi Cabrera says "it is true that since the Government is doing everything possible to stabilize the workforce to researchers. However, there are still many of the first calls that they are about to terminate contracts without being offered any solution. However, Cabrera acknowledges the support of Ministry of Education to these
researchers: "Apart from initiatives such as I3, a program that encourages stable contracts researchers paying the first three years of salary, is considering working with one of the Cajal through separate lines of funding. "
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)